February 13, 2006

Open letter to Ann Coulter

Ann,

The first time I ever heard of you was back in the day on Politically Incorrect with Bill Mahrer. You earned an enormous number of brownie points back then for repeatedly poking Bill in the eye. Sure, you were a bit snarky, but you were at least funny. Here, I thought, was a great spokesperson for the right. Smart, attractive, witty and more than able to hold her own against the shrill leftists. There were times when I thought you went a tad overboard as a polemicist, but still I defended you. After all: poking Bill Maher in the eye, repeatedly.

I read Slander, which I thought provided great detail on the hypocrisy of the left and its proponents repeated attacks on conservatives. It was funny. Harsh, at times, but rightfully so in most cases. Again, when you appeared to step over the line: poking Bill Mahrer in the eye.

Then you released Treason. That's where you started to lose me. Essentially, you painted all liberals as treasonous bastards. Listen up, Ann: I'm as big a critic of the JFK administration as anyone, but when you use a brush wide enough to paint that president, as flawed as he was, as a traitor, you've gone off the deep end. While you made many valid points in the book, they were pretty much lost in the white noise of the crap. The whole Bill Mahrer eye thing isn't providing the necessary balance anymore. Still, you did, at times, at least seem funny in your criticisms, so I decided to give you another chance.

I guess that we all have to live with our mistakes. Thanks for making mine so painfull:


She referred to Muslims as "ragheads." She went farther than calling for Justice John Paul Stevens to be poisoned. Muhammad is depicted as a historic law-giver on one of the court's frieses. Coulter wanted Muslims informed so they would burn down the Supreme Court. But just before that happened someone would call Justices Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Kennedy.

Ann, I have to ask you: when did you stop trying to be funny and just become mean? The whole "I hope your daughter is raped to death-JUST KIDDING!" schtick is something that I expect from my political opponents, and then only from the frothing at the mouth crazy ones. Reasonable people simply don't talk that way. If I haven't made myself clear to this point, that means that I've ceased to think of you as reasonable in any way, shape, or form. And I'm willing to bet most of my allies in the center or on the right feel the same way. Face it, Ann: you've lost us. You're now nothing more than the Right's version of the posters at the Daily Kos. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but hey, life is tough.

Here's a little advice that I'm certain you won't follow: apologize. Admit that you screwed up royally and that you've seen the error of your ways. No one would expect you to stop being a smartass. Heck, it's part of your appeal, especially to a smartass like me. But we'd like you to think a little bit more about what you say, before you say it.

I know what you're thinking. Yes, apologizing would give the left a bigger cudgel to beat you around the head and shoulders with. Frankly, though, you deserve it this time. At least being genuinely sorry could bring some of your former supporters like me back around. I have to tell you, though, that you're facing an uphill battle this time. So apologize. Be sincere. Accept the rhetorical beatings to follow. It's what a grownup would do, so of course I don't expect you to listen.

Sincerely,

A former, saddened supporter.

Update: I see that Dean was already at this point long ago. Hey, some of us have to learn the hard way.

Update: Ace thinks that it's time for an intervention.

Update: And it's the last; this topic weries me. Jeff Harrell is spot on in his criticism:


There are those out there who think that controversial speech should be controlled by the government. There are those who think that saying things like what Ann Coulter said -- or publishing editorial cartoons deemed by some to be sacriligious -- should be against the law. These people clearly have the wrong idea. But just because Ann Coulter should be allowed, by law, to say whatever she wants to whichever audience chooses to invite her, so also should she be held responsible for saying things that do more harm than good. And calling people "ragheads" to resounding applause certainly does more harm than good. Harm to the conservative cause, harm to east-west relations and harm to the national discourse.

Ann, seriously. From now on, just stay off our side.

Update: I lied. Michelle Malkin has collection of links to conservatives ragging on Ann.

See how easy that was Ann? I used the word "rag" in a non-pejorative fashion. You idiot.

Really, the final update: John Hawkins has been a huge Coulter fan for a long time. If memory serves, he even had an interview with her once on his blog. And now she's losing his support. Money quote:


But, if she can't tone it down a few notches and stop being so deliberately outrageous (and yes, it's all deliberate), she's going to be written off like Pat Robertson by a lot of conservatives sooner, rather than later (It's worth noting that a lot of conservatives have already said good-bye to Ann).

Posted by: Physics Geek at 01:00 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 938 words, total size 6 kb.

1 02 14 06 Hey there: I found you via Dean's world and like your blog here. I have felt that way about Ms. Coulter for a while and have never blogrolled her. Why not check out the CATO Institute for hard analysis on economic issues or even the Federalist Society? I think they might be more fulfilling for you intellectually etc. BTW, since you are a physics geek, I invite you to pay a visit to my blog. Aside from some personal musings, I have changed its format to focus on current development in physics. Take care and have a nice day. Thanks for your post to Ms. Coulter, her intolerance in unacceptable at this point!

Posted by: Mahndisa at February 14, 2006 05:51 AM (5RTUK)

2 I don't mind her intolerance, it's her lack of creative wit that I find annoying. "I hope the Supreme Court burns down and the liberal justices die" isn't funny. She should try something more like: "then all the angry Muslims would gather around the Supreme Court building and glare at it until it collapses under the pressure of their collective hatred. The conservative justices would flee in robe-wetting terror, as any sensible person would. The liberals, sadly, would stay inside, busily wondering aloud "why they hate us" until they were crushed under the tumbling rubble, causing me to collapse into a fit of schadenfreude-induced giggling." Not great, but better. Anyway, if you feel like doing another update, I actually defend the raghead remark: http://badexample.mu.nu/archives/157984.php

Posted by: Harvey at February 15, 2006 11:24 PM (ubhj8)

3 To make matters worse, she once compared terrorists to science-fiction fans.

Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at February 18, 2006 10:50 PM (accr5)

4 I couldn't agree more. The lovely, and frighteningly angry Ms Coulter lost me a few diatribes ago. Harvey, your joke is much better.

Posted by: Mark W at February 23, 2006 02:37 PM (yTuVc)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.04, elapsed 0.1465 seconds.
91 queries taking 0.1278 seconds, 236 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.