February 17, 2005

In a battle of wits

It's a pity that Susan Estrich is unarmed

Check out the drubbing that Michael Kinsley and Charlotte Allen inflict on Susan Estrich, metaphorically speaking, of course. Susan's screechy diatribe is reprinted in its full glory. A couple of excerpts:

[Michael Kinsley]


She is right that we should have more women writing for our op-ed page, and she is right that I am bad about answering e-mail, although she is wrong to think that this bad habit is gender-specific. What seems to have popped her cork, however, is an article by a woman that we did run. I'm sorry that she has "never heard of" Charlotte Allen, but I think it may be possible to be a woman even if Susan Estrich has never heard of you. Even a member of the Independent Women's Forum can nevertheless be a woman, perhaps.

[Charlotte Allen]


That sounded to me like what the lawyers call a "non sequitur." After all, to paraphrase Sojourner Truth, I'm a woman, ain't I? And so is my fellow IWF Web-regular Cathy Seipp, who wrote one of the other articles in the package, "La Difference Isn't Rocket Science," making fun of the female MIT biologist who got an attack of the vapors when she heard Harvard's president point out that differences between male and female brains might have something to do with the supposed statistical underrepresentation of women in science. And so was the author of the third article and the two authors who collaborated on the fourth. That's five women on the front page of the Times opinion page. Where's the "discrimination"?

... "The article last Sunday was penned by a feminist-hater I have never heard of, nor probably have you, by the name of Charlotte Allen. Her only book was about Jesus ... written eight years ago, and as far as I can tell what she does is to edit a blog for the Independent Women's Forum which is a group of right wing women who exist to get on TV and get in newspapers attacking the likes of us."

I think that translates into: Charlotte Allen is a nobody, whereas I am the great Susan Estrich.


Posted by: Physics Geek at 03:22 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 366 words, total size 2 kb.

1 "but I think it may be possible to be a woman even if Susan Estrich has never heard of you" OUCH! THAT'S gonna leave a mark :-)

Posted by: Harvey at February 17, 2005 06:54 PM (tJfh1)

2 You probably won't be able to see it, though. That gargoyle grin probably hides the makeup, instead of the other way around.

Posted by: physics geek at February 17, 2005 07:15 PM (Xvrs7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.1937, elapsed 0.1698 seconds.
91 queries taking 0.1606 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.