June 30, 2006
Lileks weighs in, as only he can. Excerpt:
September 10, 2006: The New York Times runs a story about a CIA agent named Mohammed Al-Ghouri, 1034 Summit Park, Evanston Illinois, who is attempting to penetrate a radical sleeper cell suspected of having 19 liters of homemade mustard gas. The series concludes with the agents obituary, and a moving quote from a CIA historian who notes that the al-Ghouri was one of rare, brave breed whose names and deeds are rarely known. Except in this case, of course.
Criticized for blowing the agents cover, a Times spokesman tartly noted that this man is sorry, was a government employee, and if hes using taxpayer money to take terrorists out to lunch, we think the people ought to know, if only so they judge the menu items chosen on behalf of the government. Was veal consumed? Because a lot of people are sensitive to the veal issue.
I can't even work up a "mheh" to this post, because it strikes me as strangely prescient, rather than mocking.
June 28, 2006
Best description of Sullivan that I've seen in a long time:
Heres the thing: Sullivan claims hes quite familiar with homophobic attacks from the gay left (whatever that now is), and yet he doesnt appear to have much of a problem with a progressivist agenda that, while it might ultimately push through the policy he wants (legalization of gay marriage), will do so at a price that would be more than a little damaging to the conservatism Sullivan claims to embrace. No doubt he sees himself as being pragmatic when he selectively embraces constitutionally dubious methodologies; me, I just see a guy whos spent the last several years throwing a very public temper tantrum.
June 22, 2006
We've known for several months that weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq. Despite the mainstream media and the Democrats' lying to the contrary, several chemical weapons have been found that qualify as WMD. But people have ignored the evidence...since it would blow a hole in their 'Bush Lied, people died' nonsense. To be fair, the Bush Administration has done little to correct the record on this issue.
Now a new report from the Pentagon sheds some light on just how many WMDs have been found, and it's a lot. We're not just talking an old Sarin shell here and there. No less than 500 chemical weapons have been found since 2003, according to a recently declassified defense department intelligence report. The weapons are of the mustard gas and Sarin nerve gas variety...nasty stuff.
So why isn't this major breaking news?
Because the WMDs are said to be manufactured before 1991....not in recent years. Therefore, the mainstream media and the Democrats don't count those. For some reason, they want WMDs made in recent years. Evidently the left likes their mustard gas just a little fresher. But that's not the point. This stuff can kill ... but to the left it's harmless.
All that matters is Saddam Hussein was lying when he said he got rid of all his WMDs. He clearly did not. Also, what do you suppose would have happened had Hussein sold some of these WMD's to Islamic terrorists? It wouldn't have been pretty. But this story will be ignored...and the leftist propaganda machine that says Saddam Hussein wasn't a threat will roll on.
I question the timing.
An official involved in the inquiry in Jordan told AFP news agency: We found primary materials to make a chemical bomb which, if it had exploded, would have made nearly 20,000 deaths in an area of one square kilometre. The target of this bomb was the headquarters of the Intelligence Services, situated on a hill in the western suburb of Amman, he added.
Here that ripping sound? That's the sound of goalposts being moved.
Final update: From Bill Quick: Which is, of course, not just moving the goalposts down the field, but over to another planet.
What he said.
June 19, 2006
Nobody wants to see your sagging mug or watch your lying lips, especially not in high definition.
Go home. Go to bed. Or go watch nostalgia movies about a time that never existed, over and over again, all alone.
I rather like that image, by the way: You, sitting in a darkened movie theater, a stray tear leaking down your raddled cheek over what might have been, might have been, but never will be again. All...alone.
Makes me feel all warm and happy inside.
June 06, 2006
June 05, 2006
UPDATE - Podhoretz the Younger does not disappoint with the eminently predictable reaction to Noonan's column:
In my book, Can She Be Stopped?, I specifically warn Republicans and conservatives about the temptation to listen to the "siren song of schism" the notion that they would be better off casting a protest or third-party vote in 2008. Such a vote, no matter how principled it might seem, would have only one result, and that is to elect Hillary Clinton. It is a default vote for Hillary Clinton....
If people cannot stomach voting Republican and need to cast a protest vote, that is their right. But nobody should be under any illusions about what it means. It means Democratic rule.
Which differs from the current rule in precisely what regards? Ignoring the Constitution 90 percent of the time instead of 75 percent? Signing up for 100 percent of globalist decrees instead of 85 percent of them? Invading and occupying countries without oil instead of countries with oil?
Better an open enemy that faces you than the false friend who stabs you in the back.
I'm beginning to think that it's time to resurrect the Howard the Duck campaign.
89 queries taking 0.1878 seconds, 222 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.